AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC152014_06B2203: Published material about the person

AAO EB-1A decision DEC152014_06B2203: Published material about the person

EB-1A published material about the person — AAO decision DEC152014_06B2203: Appeal dismissed; prior denial affirmed. Review source status, procedural…

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed; prior denial affirmed AAO found the judging criterion and artistic display criterion met; published material and original contributions not met. It reaffirmed no three-criterion threshold; final merits not reached, while an aggregate review also found acclaim unsupported.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete printed AAO Form I-140 EB-1A source; identity/date/posture checked against the opening page and disposition against the ending page.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC152014_06B2203

Decision date as printed

December 15, 2014

Classification / field stated in source

Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).

Procedural posture

Motion to reopen and reconsider after prior appeal dismissal; prior July 3, 2014 decision affirmed and petition remains denied.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed; prior denial affirmed

Final-merits status

AAO states the petitioner failed the antecedent three-criterion requirement; it did not conduct a separate final-merits determination, though it comments on the aggregate record.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found the judging criterion and artistic display criterion met; published material and original contributions not met. It reaffirmed no three-criterion threshold; final merits not reached, while an aggregate review also found acclaim unsupported.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 3, p. 4, p. 5

Judging the work of others

met — p. 5

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 6, p. 7, p. 8, p. 9, p. 10

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

met — p. 10

Leading or critical role

Not considered — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The matter was a motion after the July 3, 2014 appeal decision; AAO affirmed that decision and the petition remained denied.; pages: 2; 11

  • claim: AAO found judging of art students met and display of artwork at exhibitions/showcases met, but published material and original contributions not met.; pages: 3; 5; 6; 7; 8; 9; 10

  • claim: AAO found only two discussed criteria met and affirmed denial without proceeding to formal final merits.; pages: 10; 11

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible with caveats

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC152014_06B2203