AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC142017_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

AAO EB-1A decision DEC142017_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision DEC142017_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). Review source status, procedural posture and…

Decision summary: AAO decision DEC142017_01B2203: Appeal dismissed (p. 6). AAO found published material and display criteria met, but original contributions not met; therefore fewer than three criteria. The record also failed to establish intent to continue work in visual arts in the U.S. (pp. 3–6).

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC142017_01B2203

Decision date as printed

December 14, 2017

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts; artist/visual artist (Matter of B-) (pp. 1–2).

Procedural posture

Appeal of Texas Service Center denial; AAO reviewed evidentiary criteria and continuation-of-work requirement (pp. 1–6).

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed (p. 6).

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found published material and display criteria met, but original contributions not met; therefore fewer than three criteria. The record also failed to establish intent to continue work in visual arts in the U.S. (pp. 3–6).

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

met — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

not met
Reviews, sales, exhibitions, and letters did not specifically show significant field-wide impact; some supporting evidence postdated filing (pp. 3–5). — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"No completeness issue; distinct anonymous matter and citation from the other same-date AAO decision."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • p1: Matter of B-, date, appeal, artist, initial denial.; p2: Two-step EB-1A standard and decision context.; p3: Director’s initial two findings and AAO review of published material/original contributions.; p4: Original-contributions evidence and letters.; p5: Original-contributions conclusion, display criterion met, intent-to-work failure.; p6: No full final merits required; appeal dismissed.

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Good fit for visual-artist criterion-level content: favorable findings on media coverage and exhibition display contrasted with original-contribution / intent-to-work deficiencies. Do not merge with same-date Matter of F-S- as one case. Eligible for individual case summary and visual-artist criterion comparison; keep identity and outcome separate from F-S-.

Editorial use note: Eligible for individual case summary and visual-artist criterion comparison; keep identity and outcome separate from F-S-.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Performance sector research

  • Coverage research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC142017_01B2203