AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision DEC142005_04B2203: The appeal is summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). Review source status…
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC142005_04B2203: The appeal is summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). p. 2 recounts no arguments/evidence addressing the pertinent criteria, the petitioner’s statement that no separate brief/evidence would be filed, and orders dismissal.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC142005_04B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | December 14, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal/AAO action as printed in source; for JAN072026_03B2203, source terminology is recorded separately and preserved in its posture and caveat. |
Procedural posture | Appeal from a Vermont Service Center EB-1A denial. The decision attributes the conclusion that sustained acclaim was not established to the Director. |
Operative disposition | The appeal is summarily dismissed under 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v). |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
p. 2 recounts no arguments/evidence addressing the pertinent criteria, the petitioner’s statement that no separate brief/evidence would be filed, and orders dismissal.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not reached |
Membership | not reached |
Published material about the person | not reached |
Judging the work of others | not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | not reached |
Scholarly authorship | not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | not reached |
Leading or critical role | not reached |
High salary or remuneration | not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not reached |
Source holds and limits
["The service-center merits conclusion is reported, not affirmed by substantive AAO analysis."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
The service-center merits conclusion is reported, not affirmed by substantive AAO analysis.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 1, cover/instruction page
p. 2, DISCUSSION and ORDER
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural comparison with appeals dismissed because no specific error or supporting appellate record was provided. Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision. It may be used only as a source-cited example in a broader procedural explainer after the relevant comparison set is fully reviewed.
Editorial use note: Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision. It may be used only as a source-cited example in a broader procedural explainer after the relevant comparison set is fully reviewed.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.