AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC132023_01B2203: Judging the work of others

AAO EB-1A decision DEC132023_01B2203: Judging the work of others

EB-1A judging the work of others — AAO decision DEC132023_01B2203: Director decision withdrawn; matter remanded for new revocation decision. Review source…

Decision summary: The AAO director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new revocation decision. AAO found NOIR and revocation did not identify alleged fraudulent documents or specific facts/evidence adequately, did not analyze three-criterion eligibility, and did not address petitioner’s rebuttal. Remand requires specific factual grounds and evidence.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC132023_01B2203

Decision date as printed

December 13, 2023

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability petition / AAO decision

Procedural posture

Appeal of revocation of previously approved EB-1A petition after State Department/NVC return and fraud allegation; de novo review.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for new revocation decision.

Final-merits status

Not reached_AAO_remand

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO found NOIR and revocation did not identify alleged fraudulent documents or specific facts/evidence adequately, did not analyze three-criterion eligibility, and did not address petitioner’s rebuttal. Remand requires specific factual grounds and evidence.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

unclear
Initially claimed; remand requires Director to fully analyze eligibility. — p. 3, p. 4

Original contributions of major significance

unclear
Claimed; no final AAO merits decision. — p. 3, p. 4

Scholarly authorship

unclear
Claimed; no final AAO merits decision. — p. 3, p. 4

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source holds and limits

"Sensitive, unresolved fraud allegation; do not describe petitioner as having committed fraud. Subsequent remand decision not included."

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Petition initially approved in Jan. 2016; petitioner became permanent resident in April 2016; case returned in 2020; NOIR issued in 2023 alleging fraudulent documents.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: Petitioner contested lack of specificity and submitted work-history rebuttal plus additional evidence, including 453 citations, patents, peer review/editorial evidence.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: AAO held notices lacked adequate factual support and specific document identification, and final revocation did not address rebuttal/criteria; Remanded.; pages: 4; 5

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: eligible_procedural_context_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Medicine sector research

  • Remand research

  • Revocation research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC132023_01B2203