AAO research
EB-1A appeal timeliness — AAO decision DEC072009_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official…
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC072009_01B2203: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC072009_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Appeal rejected as untimely filed. The appeal was received 36 days after the Director decision, beyond the 33-day mailed-decision deadline, and did not satisfy motion requirements.; citation_pages: 1; 2; classification: Appeal rejected as untimely; director_findings: Director denied May 18, 2009 and provided 33 days to appeal. Counsel dated the appeal June 16, postmarked June 19, and it was received June 23, 36 days after the decision. AAO found it untimely and not qualifying as a motion to reopen or reconsider; rejected. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Appeal rejected as untimely filed.', 'basis': 'The appeal was received 36 days after the Director decision, beyond the 33-day mailed-decision deadline, and did not satisfy motion requirements.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {‘fit’: ‘untimely_appeal’, ‘aggregation_valid’: True, ‘use’: ‘Procedural grouping with ordinary late appeals; retain dated, postmarked, and received-date distinctions.’, ‘do_not_claim’: [‘Do not treat an appeal dismissal or procedural rejection as approval or a substantive criterion precedent.’, ‘Do not infer individual criterion results beyond the exact states expressly described.’, ‘Do not treat a remand as approval or as resolution of the Remanded issue.’, ‘Do not treat an explicitly nonprecedent decision as binding authority.’], ‘caveat’: ‘No AAO criterion merits review.’}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Untimely research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.