AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision DEC042012_01B2203: Motion dismissed; July 30, 2012 decision affirmed; petition denied. Review source status…
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC042012_01B2203: Motion dismissed; July 30, 2012 decision affirmed; petition denied. Formal requirements unmet; no new error/facts.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC042012_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | December 4, 2012 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability. |
Procedural posture | Third reconsideration motion; missing judicial statement, no specific error, repeats old claims. |
Operative disposition | Motion dismissed; July 30, 2012 decision affirmed; petition denied. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
Formal requirements unmet; no new error/facts.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
Missing judicial-proceeding statement; motion rules. (PDF p. 2)
Prior decision limited to new evidence, post-filing evidence and late brief; current filing repeats merits. (PDF p. 3)
Motion dismissed; petition remains denied. (PDF p. 4)
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Aggregate only around narrow procedural/evidence issue; distinguish motion holdings from merits decisions.
Editorial use note: Eligible for carefully scoped, cited content with precise posture and nonprecedent status.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.