AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC042009_03B2203: Appeal arguments

AAO EB-1A decision DEC042009_03B2203: Appeal arguments

EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision DEC042009_03B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision DEC042009_03B2203: Appeal summarily dismissed. Director found sustained acclaim, major internationally recognized award, or at least three criteria not established. Counsel called the decision arbitrary/capricious and promised brief/evidence within 30 days; more than six months passed with none; no specific error was identified.

Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.

Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC042009_03B2203

Decision date as printed

December 4, 2009

Classification / field stated in source

Arts

Procedural posture

Texas Service Center EB-1A denial; counsel appealed.

Operative disposition

Appeal summarily dismissed.

Final-merits status

Not reached

What the AAO decision addressed

Director found sustained acclaim, major internationally recognized award, or at least three criteria not established. Counsel called the decision arbitrary/capricious and promised brief/evidence within 30 days; more than six months passed with none; no specific error was identified.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached
The AAO disposition is procedural (or a motion/appeal jurisdiction disposition); no EB-1A criterion was adjudicated in this decision. — source PDF

Source holds and limits

status:

Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer

  • Director’s criteria findings are background only.

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover date December 4, 2009; Texas Service Center; EB-1A Form I-140.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director found no major internationally recognized award and fewer than three criteria (as well as acclaim not established); field is arts.; pages: 2

  • claim: Counsel called decision arbitrary/capricious and promised brief/evidence within 30 days, but more than six months passed without further documentation.; pages: 2

  • claim: AAO found no specific error of law/fact and summarily dismissed appeal.; pages: 2

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Membership research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Performance sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC042009_03B2203