AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision DEC042009_02B2203: A bodybuilder's appeal was dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC042009_02B2203: A bodybuilder’s appeal was dismissed.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC042009_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | Not stated in normalized review fields |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | Procedural posture not separately coded in the normalized review fields. Consult the source PDF. |
Operative disposition | A bodybuilder's appeal was dismissed. |
Final-merits status | "No distinct formal final-merits determination; decision contains an overall conclusion about acclaim." |
What the AAO decision addressed
A bodybuilder's appeal was dismissed.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | not met — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | not met — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not coded — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
finding: The AAO found claimed bodybuilding prizes were regional or amateur/junior awards, lacked proof of national/international recognition, and were stale, with no awards documented after 1998.; pages: 4-6
finding: The AAO found the visual-artistic-display criterion was not established. It discussed the petitioner's argument that bodybuilding is art and guest posing is display, but found no evidence the events were artistic showcases; routine competition before an audience was insufficient.; pages: 8-10
finding: The AAO found leadership of a Russian Athletes Association not adequately documented for distinguished reputation or the petitioner's critical role, and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 10-11
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Whether bodybuilding competitions, guest posing, or tournaments qualified as display at artistic exhibitions/showcases.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.