AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision DEC042007_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision DEC042007_01B2203: Motion to reconsider dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_procedural_eb1a_decision. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | DEC042007_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2006-12-04 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | AAO_posture: Motion to reconsider dismissed. The motion was filed about eight months after the latest decision, with no showing of reasonable delay beyond petitioner’s control, and did not allege error in the latest decision.; citation_pages: 1; 2; 3; classification: Motion to reconsider dismissed_untimely_no_error; director_findings: Director denied May 19, 2005 for lack of sustained acclaim; AAO summarily dismissed appeal February 16, 2006 after no promised supplemental brief arrived. Petitioner filed a motion to reconsider November 24, 2006, about eight months later, without showing a reasonable delay beyond her control or an address change before the decision. The motion did not allege error in the latest AAO decision and was dismissed as untimely. |
Operative disposition | {'outcome': 'Motion to reconsider dismissed.', 'basis': 'The motion was filed about eight months after the latest decision, with no showing of reasonable delay beyond petitioner’s control, and did not allege error in the latest decision.', 'citation_pages': [1, 2, 3]} |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: {'fit': 'late_motion_no_error_alleged', 'aggregation_valid': True, 'use': 'Procedural comparison for timeliness and scope of reconsideration; do not interpret the underlying summary dismissal as criterion analysis.', 'do_not_claim': ['Do not characterize a procedural rejection or dismissal as approval or completed merits adjudication.', 'Do not infer individual criterion outcomes from aggregate Director findings.', 'Do not treat remand/return for motion consideration as approval.', 'Do not treat explicitly nonprecedent decisions as binding authority.'], 'caveat': 'No criterion or final-merits reconsideration.'}
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Summary Dismissal research
Untimely research
Remand research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.