AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC032009_02B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision DEC032009_02B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision DEC032009_02B2203: Motion granted prior decision affirmed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision DEC032009_02B2203: Motion granted prior decision affirmed. This is a motion decision affirming the prior denial; it does not make a new formal final-merits determination. Criterion analysis is partly incorporated by reference to the March 19, 2009 decision, not reproduced in this source.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source identifies an EB-1A Form I-140 petition under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC032009_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2009-12-03

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability under INA §203(b)(1)(A)

Procedural posture

AAO motion to reconsider; motion granted for reconsideration, prior March 19, 2009 AAO decision affirmed, petition denied.

Operative disposition

motion_granted_prior_decision_affirmed

Final-merits status

This is a motion decision affirming the prior denial; it does not make a new formal final-merits determination. Criterion analysis is partly incorporated by reference to the March 19, 2009 decision, not reproduced in this source.

What the AAO decision addressed

This is a motion decision affirming the prior denial; it does not make a new formal final-merits determination. Criterion analysis is partly incorporated by reference to the March 19, 2009 decision, not reproduced in this source.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 5, p. 6, p. 7

Membership

Not met — p. 7

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 7, p. 8

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 7

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 7

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The beneficiary sought EB-1A classification as a competitive shooter and instructor; the AAO distinguished athletic acclaim from coaching/instruction acclaim.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: The motion alleged Olympic-team participation as a one-time achievement, but the record lacked primary or sufficient secondary evidence of Olympic-team membership or medal receipt.; pages: 4; 5; 6; 7

  • claim: AAO incorporated its prior March 19, 2009 decision by reference and stated the criteria claimed there were not established; it rejected the motion arguments.; pages: 2; 7; 8; 9

  • claim: Order affirms prior AAO decision and denies the petition.; pages: 9

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC032009_02B2203