AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision DEC032007_01B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision DEC032007_01B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision DEC032007_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed School-age competition awards were not shown to establish acclaim at the top of the full table-tennis field and were remote from filing; membership and published material were not established, and referee evidence did not document judging. The AAO also found no continuation-of-work evidence.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: The source is an AAO EB-1A appeal or related motion with decision-specific procedural/evidentiary analysis.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

DEC032007_01B2203

Decision date as printed

December 3, 2007

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary-ability petition appeal or related motion

Procedural posture

Legacy EB-1A appeal; appeal dismissed.

Operative disposition

Appeal dismissed

Final-merits status

Legacy decision; AAO made an aggregate sustained-acclaim/top-of-field finding without a modern separate final-merits stage.

What the AAO decision addressed

School-age competition awards were not shown to establish acclaim at the top of the full table-tennis field and were remote from filing; membership and published material were not established, and referee evidence did not document judging. The AAO also found no continuation-of-work evidence.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3, p. 4

Membership

Not met — p. 4

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 5

Judging the work of others

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner sought classification as a table-tennis athlete; the petition was filed June 22, 2005.; pages: 2

  • claim: The listed awards were largely school-age or local competitions, lacked certified translations or evidence of field-wide competition, and were 15+ years before filing; the 2005 Hawaii event was a local recreational competition.; pages: 3; 4

  • claim: National Table Tennis Association membership evidence lacked certified translation and rules showing expert-judged outstanding-achievement admission.; pages: 4; 5

  • claim: A local Korean-language article lacked qualifying focus, author, translation, and major-media evidence; referee certification lacked the original document, evidence of actual judging, and evaluated competitors/assessments.; pages: 5; 6

  • claim: Comparable evidence was not available because the criteria were not shown inapplicable; AAO found no evidence of plans to continue table tennis work in the United States and dismissed.; pages: 6; 7

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Athletics sector research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for DEC032007_01B2203