AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision AUG302022_02B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed. Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: AAO decision AUG302022_02B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed. AAO concluded the petitioner supplied no new facts warranting reopening and showed no legal or factual error in the prior decision. Repeated evidence and arguments did not establish the prior ruling erroneous. The decision does not readjudicate the underlying petition.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A motion practice; prior merits findings are recited, not newly adjudicated.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | AUG302022_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | August 30, 2022 |
Classification / field stated in source | Third combined motion to reopen and reconsider; dismissed |
Procedural posture | Current matter is a motion directed to the AAO’s prior dismissal of an appeal and earlier motion proceedings. The petitioner argued she did not receive notice that the appeal had been transferred to AAO and resubmitted evidence; AAO confined review to the prior motion decision. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed. |
Final-merits status | No new final-merits analysis; underlying petition remains denied. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO concluded the petitioner supplied no new facts warranting reopening and showed no legal or factual error in the prior decision. Repeated evidence and arguments did not establish the prior ruling erroneous. The decision does not readjudicate the underlying petition.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover identifies a motion on an EB-1A Form I-140 and is dated August 30, 2022; the decision recites prior denial for failure to establish a one-time achievement or three criteria.; pages: 1
claim: AAO limits the present proceeding to the prior decision on the earlier motion; it discusses reopening/reconsideration requirements.; pages: 1; 2
claim: AAO finds no new facts warrant reopening and no demonstrated error warranting reconsideration; both motions are dismissed.; pages: 2; 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural only; exclude from fresh EB-1A criterion-outcome counts.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Medicine sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.