AAO research
EB-1A remand — AAO decision AUG302007_04B2203: remanded. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Remanded The AAO found the revocation notice and Director’s decision did not adequately address the evidence and employment/continuing-work issue. It withdrew the Director’s decision and Remanded for further action; it did not decide ultimate EB-1A eligibility.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | AUG302007_04B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2007-08-30 |
Classification / field stated in source | Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related proceeding |
Procedural posture | AAO review of the Director’s revocation of a previously approved Form I-140 EB-1A petition; further review and consideration Remanded. |
Operative disposition | Remanded |
Final-merits status | unresolved; no final-merits determination on this remand. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found the revocation notice and Director’s decision did not adequately address the evidence and employment/continuing-work issue. It withdrew the Director’s decision and Remanded for further action; it did not decide ultimate EB-1A eligibility.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The AAO found the revocation notice and Director’s decision did not adequately address the evidence and employment/continuing-work issue. It withdrew the Director’s decision and Remanded for further action; it did not decide ultimate EB-1A eligibility.; pages: 4; 5; 6; 7
claim: Decision date, caption/classification and field verified from the source PDF.; pages: 1
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: caveats: This is a revocation/remand proceeding, not a new final eligibility approval. Source has redactions; date and order remain legible.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Procedural comparison on revocation notices, evidence rebutting a notice of intent to revoke, and proof of continuing work in the area of extraordinary ability.; recommended_use: A source-cited decision page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, exact criterion states and whether final merits was reached.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Athletics sector research
Performance sector research
Final Merits research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.