AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision Aug242010_01B2203
A well‑documented peer‑review record and a strong publication portfolio can convert a director’s two‑criterion finding into a successful AAO decision on the judging and scholarly‑article criteria. The decision offers a generic, multi‑criterion evidence lesson without a distinctive profession or nove
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID Aug242010_01B2203 Decision date 2010-08-24 Outcome sustained Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
judging
original_contributions
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
judging
original contributions
scholarly articles
Criteria Rejected
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Core Lesson
A well‑documented peer‑review record and a strong publication portfolio can convert a director’s two‑criterion finding into a successful AAO decision on the judging and scholarly‑article criteria.
Evidence Issue
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.