AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG222016_02B2203

Generic praise and vague impact statements are not enough; you must provide concrete, documented proof (citations, adoption, measurable influence) that your work has significantly advanced the field. Concrete, documented evidence of how the petitioner’s work has significantly impacted the field; Cit

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG222016_02B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • leading_critical_role

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • original_contributions

  • membership

Core Lesson

Generic praise and vague impact statements are not enough; you must provide concrete, documented proof (citations, adoption, measurable influence) that your work has significantly advanced the field.

Evidence Issue

  • Concrete, documented evidence of how the petitioner’s work has significantly impacted the field

  • Citation counts or evidence of frequent citation by other researchers

  • Specific examples of adoption or application of the petitioner’s research in the field

  • Detailed explanation linking publications/letters to measurable field advancement

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.