AAO research
EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision AUG212013_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; May 7, 2013 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. Review…
Decision summary: AAO decision AUG212013_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; May 7, 2013 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. No new evidence addressed latest decision; June 2013 email and translation concerned October 2011 conference after petition filing; repeated factual material and claims were not new.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: EB-1A procedural successive motion.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | AUG212013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | August 21, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | Successive motion to reopen dismissed |
Procedural posture | Earlier EB-1A denial and appeal/motion history. Current motion repeated previous claims, omitted required judicial-proceedings statement, alleged prior motion misdirection without evidence, and relied on conference material after filing. |
Operative disposition | Motion to reopen dismissed; May 7, 2013 decision affirmed; petition remains denied. |
Final-merits status | Not coded in the normalized review fields |
What the AAO decision addressed
No new evidence addressed latest decision; June 2013 email and translation concerned October 2011 conference after petition filing; repeated factual material and claims were not new.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not reached — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover dated August 21, 2013 identifies EB-1A petition and self-represented petitioner.; pages: 1
claim: Director denied June 12, 2012; AAO dismissed appeal Nov. 3, 2012 and motion to reopen May 7, 2013; current motion dismissed.; pages: 2
claim: Required judicial-proceedings statement again omitted; petitioner failed to address latest decision.; pages: 2
claim: Only new material was a June 2013 certified translation of an email apparently sent in October 2011 about a conference, after the Nov. 15, 2007 filing; it did not establish eligibility at filing.; pages: 3
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Procedural-only; exclude from outcome aggregation.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Published material about the person research
Leading or critical role research
Translat research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.