AAO EB-1A decision AUG212006_01B2203: athlete (runner) and artistic display evidence pitfalls for eb‑1a

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG212006_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation athlete (runner) Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

• artistic_display

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

• artistic_display

• awards

• judging

• leading_critical_role

• membership

• original_contributions

• published_material

Core Lesson

Athletic competition achievements must be directly tied to the specific EB‑1A criteria; generic race results, unverified awards, or vague judging certificates are insufficient for a successful petition.

Evidence Issue

• Documentation proving the races constitute nationally or internationally recognized awards.

• Concrete evidence that the petitioner actually performed judging duties at a competition.

• Proof of an official, leading or critical role on a team with a recognized reputation.

• Details of membership criteria and verification for the Byelorussian national running team.

• Copies of the cited publications, evidence they are major trade or professional outlets, and circulation numbers.

• Demonstration of influence on the field or major original contributions (e.g., top‑3 finishes, citations).

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.