AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG162006_05B2203: Awards

AAO EB-1A decision AUG162006_05B2203: Awards

EB-1A awards — AAO decision AUG162006_05B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: AAO decision AUG162006_05B2203: dismissed. The AAO found the petitioner had not established three criteria as a squash coach. Prior athlete awards and experience did not establish coach-specific acclaim; membership, published material and coaching contribution evidence were also insufficient.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Complete EB-1A AAO decision or related proceeding reviewed from assigned source PDF; no publication or CMS changes.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

AUG162006_05B2203

Decision date as printed

2006-08-16

Classification / field stated in source

Nonprecedent AAO EB-1A appellate or related proceeding

Procedural posture

Appeal of Vermont Service Center denial of Form I-140 EB-1A petition.

Operative disposition

dismissed

Final-merits status

Not reached; initial threshold failed; the record also did not establish acclaim as a coach.

What the AAO decision addressed

The AAO found the petitioner had not established three criteria as a squash coach. Prior athlete awards and experience did not establish coach-specific acclaim; membership, published material and coaching contribution evidence were also insufficient.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not met — p. 3

Membership

Not met — p. 4

Published material about the person

Not met — p. 5

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not met — p. 5, p. 6

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not met — p. 4

High salary or remuneration

Not considered — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — p. 3

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The AAO found the petitioner had not established three criteria as a squash coach. Prior athlete awards and experience did not establish coach-specific acclaim; membership, published material and coaching contribution evidence were also insufficient.; pages: 2; 7

  • claim: Decision date, caption/classification and field verified from the source PDF.; pages: 1

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: caveats: Older nonprecedent decision with redactions and pre-Kazarian overall-acclaim language.; eligible_for_aggregation: True; eligible_for_individual_decision_page: True; reason: Narrow coaching comparison on separating athletic achievements from evidence of acclaim and impact as a coach.; recommended_use: A source-cited decision page or tightly scoped aggregation preserving date, field, procedural posture, exact criterion states and whether final merits was reached.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Athletics sector research

  • Final Merits research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for AUG162006_05B2203