AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG152005_03B2203

Local, non‑professional recognitions, routine managerial duties, and generic salary data do not meet EB‑1A awards, judging, membership, or high‑salary criteria; evidence must clearly demonstrate national/international acclaim and be comparable to top peers. Evidence of nationally or internationally

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG152005_03B2203 Decision date not stated in the extraction Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Criteria Accepted

  • leading_critical_role

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • membership

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

Local, non‑professional recognitions, routine managerial duties, and generic salary data do not meet EB‑1A awards, judging, membership, or high‑salary criteria; evidence must clearly demonstrate national/international acclaim and be comparable to top peers.

Evidence Issue

  • Evidence of nationally or internationally recognized awards (local or political awards deemed insufficient)

  • Salary comparison showing the beneficiary’s base salary is at the top of the field

  • Proof that duties constitute judging the work of others beyond ordinary managerial responsibilities

  • Membership in an organization limited to individuals with outstanding achievements

  • Documented original contributions of major significance to the field

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.