AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG132025_02B2203

When asserting original contributions, you must provide clear, authoritative evidence of the work’s impact and significance—not just a list of publications or funding figures. Specific, quantitative proof of how the work influenced the field; Evidence of major significance beyond mere publication co

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG132025_02B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • judging

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

  • original_contributions

Core Lesson

When asserting original contributions, you must provide clear, authoritative evidence of the work’s impact and significance—not just a list of publications or funding figures.

Evidence Issue

  • Specific, quantitative proof of how the work influenced the field

  • Evidence of major significance beyond mere publication count

  • Demonstration of sustained national or international acclaim for the contributions

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.