AAO research
AAO EB-1A decision AUG122005_19B2203
Certificates, post‑filing media, and routine duties are insufficient for EB‑1A; petitions must provide nationally recognized awards, certified translations, pre‑filing evidence, and clear proof that the activity is beyond ordinary responsibilities. Certified English translations for foreign‑language
Decision Snapshot
Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG122005_19B2203 Decision date 2005-08-12 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes
Criteria Discussed
awards
high_salary
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
scholarly_articles
Criteria Accepted
Not stated in the extracted decision plan.
Criteria Rejected
awards
high_salary
judging
leading_critical_role
membership
original_contributions
published_material
scholarly_articles
Core Lesson
Certificates, post‑filing media, and routine duties are insufficient for EB‑1A; petitions must provide nationally recognized awards, certified translations, pre‑filing evidence, and clear proof that the activity is beyond ordinary responsibilities.
Evidence Issue
Certified English translations for foreign‑language articles and TV transcripts
Evidence that the certificates constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes
Comparative salary data to show the petitioner’s earnings are significantly higher than peers
Proof that the beneficiary’s judging role was beyond routine duties and recognized by the field
Documentation that membership certificates were issued before the petition filing date and that the organizations require outstanding achievement
Demonstration that the handbook and articles were published before filing and received significant independent recognition
Evidence that the beneficiary’s contributions were major, widely recognized advances in the field
Proof that the role was a leading or critical position recognized by peers
How This Connects
This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.
Source Note
Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.