AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision AUG112005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed under summary-dismissal rule. Review source status, procedural posture and the…
Decision summary: AAO decision AUG112005_09B2203: Appeal dismissed under summary-dismissal rule. Counsel asserted revocation was legal error and said evidence established extraordinary ability; requested 90 days for a brief/evidence. Over seven months later none arrived; counsel confirmed July 21, 2005 that she had not filed promised materials. AAO found no specific error or evidence addressing revocation grounds.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Scope classification from review: in_scope_EB1A_AAO_decision_no_precedent_status_asserted. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | AUG112005_09B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | August 11, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | Arts |
Procedural posture | California Service Center initially approved EB-1A petition, then served notice of intent to revoke and revoked approval; petitioner appealed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed under summary-dismissal rule. |
Final-merits status | Not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
Counsel asserted revocation was legal error and said evidence established extraordinary ability; requested 90 days for a brief/evidence. Over seven months later none arrived; counsel confirmed July 21, 2005 that she had not filed promised materials. AAO found no specific error or evidence addressing revocation grounds.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not reached — source PDF |
Membership | Not reached |
Published material about the person | Not reached — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not reached |
Original contributions of major significance | Not reached |
Scholarly authorship | Not reached |
Artistic display or showcases | Not reached |
Leading or critical role | Not reached |
High salary or remuneration | Not reached |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not reached |
Source holds and limits
status:
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
Underlying revocation analysis is not reviewed in this decision.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: Cover prints August 11, 2005; California Service Center; EB-1A Form I-140.; pages: 1
claim: Director initially approved, then on notice revoked approval; petition concerned extraordinary ability in arts.; pages: 2
claim: Counsel challenged revocation generally, promised a brief/evidence within 90 days, then confirmed July 21, 2005 she had filed none after over seven months.; pages: 2
claim: AAO found no specific legal/factual error or additional evidence addressing revocation and dismissed the appeal.; pages: 2
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: narrow_procedural_explainer_only
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Membership research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Revocation research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.