AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG082014_01B2203: Supply Chain Management and procedural dismissals in eb-1a appeals

A petition must provide concrete, plural evidence across at least three EB‑1A criteria; relying on a single book or limited association memberships is rarely sufficient. Concrete, plural evidence across at least three EB‑1A criteria; Proof that the book has already impacted the field; Multiple membe

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID AUG082014_01B2203 Decision date 2014-08-08 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Supply Chain Management Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • high_salary

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

Criteria Rejected

  • high_salary

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

A petition must provide concrete, plural evidence across at least three EB‑1A criteria; relying on a single book or limited association memberships is rarely sufficient.

Evidence Issue

  • Concrete, plural evidence across at least three EB‑1A criteria

  • Proof that the book has already impacted the field

  • Multiple memberships in recognized professional associations

  • Evidence of leading or critical role in more than one organization

  • Plain‑language documentation satisfying the high‑salary requirement

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.