AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision AUG082008_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

AAO EB-1A decision AUG082008_01B2203: Original contributions of major significance

EB-1A original contributions of major significance — AAO decision AUG082008_01B2203: Decision withdrawn and matter remanded. Review source status…

Decision summary: The AAO Decision withdrawn and matter Remanded The operative order withdraws the prior decision and remands for further proceedings because the RFE did not adequately identify the evidentiary deficiencies. No final disposition on EB-1A eligibility or separate final-merits determination is reached.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: Physical source identifies an AAO matter concerning an EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

AUG082008_01B2203

Decision date as printed

August 8, 2008

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A extraordinary ability (Form I-140)

Procedural posture

Public-copy, nonprecedent AAO appeal from Nevada Service Center EB-1A denial; AAO withdraws the decision and remands for a new decision after finding the RFE procedurally deficient.

Operative disposition

Decision withdrawn and matter Remanded

Final-merits status

No separate formal final-merits stage is reached. The operative order is a procedural remand, and eligibility remains unresolved.

What the AAO decision addressed

The operative order withdraws the prior decision and remands for further proceedings because the RFE did not adequately identify the evidentiary deficiencies. No final disposition on EB-1A eligibility or separate final-merits determination is reached.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not considered — source PDF

Membership

Not considered — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not considered — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not considered — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

unclear — p. 7, p. 8

Scholarly authorship

Not considered — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not considered — source PDF

Leading or critical role

unclear — p. 8, p. 9

High salary or remuneration

unclear — p. 9, p. 10

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not considered — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: The petitioner sought EB-1A classification for security/executive-protection work; the appeal challenges the denial and RFE process.; evidence_pages: 1; 2; 3

  • claim: AAO finds the RFE did not sufficiently identify specific deficiencies, so the petitioner lacked adequate notice of what evidence was needed.; evidence_pages: 3; 4; 5; 6

  • claim: The decision discusses eligibility evidence but vacates the challenged decision and remands rather than resolving the merits.; evidence_pages: 7; 8; 9; 10; 11

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: procedural_topic_only

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Awards research

  • Membership research

  • Published material about the person research

  • Judging the work of others research

  • Original contributions of major significance research

  • Scholarly authorship research

  • Artistic display or showcases research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • High salary or remuneration research

  • Commercial success in the performing arts research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for AUG082008_01B2203