AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision AUG032007_02B2203: remanded. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision AUG032007_02B2203: Remanded. The AAO found the notice of intent to revoke insufficiently identified the basis and evidence for revocation, preventing a meaningful response. It did not decide ultimate eligibility.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: Complete AAO decision or motion concerning EB-1A extraordinary ability.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | AUG032007_02B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2007-08-03 |
Classification / field stated in source | AAO EB-1A decision or motion proceeding |
Procedural posture | AAO review of revocation of an approved Form I-140 EB-1A petition; Director’s revocation withdrawn and case Remanded for a new notice and decision. |
Operative disposition | Remanded |
Final-merits status | The decision Remanded the matter without deciding ultimate eligibility. |
What the AAO decision addressed
The AAO found the notice of intent to revoke insufficiently identified the basis and evidence for revocation, preventing a meaningful response. It did not decide ultimate eligibility.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not considered — source PDF |
Membership | Not considered — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not considered — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not considered — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not considered — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not considered — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not considered — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not considered — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not considered — source PDF |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The Director initially approved the petition, later issued a notice of intent to revoke and revoked approval; AAO reviewed the revocation. (pp. 1–2); pages: 1; 2
claim: The AAO found the NOIR did not adequately identify the asserted inconsistencies or evidence and did not give the petitioner a meaningful opportunity to respond. (pp. 2–6); pages: 2; 6
claim: The Director’s decision was withdrawn and the matter Remanded for a new notice and decision; ultimate eligibility remains unresolved. (p. 7); pages: 7
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Remand research
Revocation research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.