AAO research
EB-1A awards — AAO decision APR162026_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: The AAO Appeal dismissed AAO withdrew SCOPS findings for awards, published material, judging, role, and salary; it also found membership and contributions unmet. Artistic display remained accepted from SCOPS, while commercial success was reserved; AAO found the initial threshold unmet.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: The PDF identifies this as an AAO Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A).. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | APR162026_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | April 16, 2026 |
Classification / field stated in source | Form I-140 EB-1A extraordinary-ability decision under INA §203(b)(1)(A). |
Procedural posture | Appeal of Service Center Operations denial following initial approval of criteria and adverse final-merits finding; appeal dismissed on de novo review. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed |
Final-merits status | SCOPS had made a final-merits finding, but AAO de novo review found the initial three-criterion threshold unmet and did not reach its own final-merits analysis. |
What the AAO decision addressed
AAO withdrew SCOPS findings for awards, published material, judging, role, and salary; it also found membership and contributions unmet. Artistic display remained accepted from SCOPS, while commercial success was reserved; AAO found the initial threshold unmet.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | |
Membership | |
Published material about the person | |
Judging the work of others | Not met — p. 5 |
Original contributions of major significance | |
Scholarly authorship | Not considered — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | met — p. 2 |
Leading or critical role | |
High salary or remuneration | |
Commercial success in the performing arts |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
claim: The petitioner is a director in film, television, and commercial production in Turkey; SCOPS found six of nine claimed categories met but denied at final merits, and AAO dismissed the appeal on de novo review.; pages: 1; 2
claim: Awards were not shown to be recognized beyond the awarding organizations; some awards did not identify the petitioner as recipient and finalist status was not an award.; pages: 3
claim: Membership requirements did not require outstanding achievement judged by recognized experts; 24 media items largely focused on projects, lacked authorship in many instances, or lacked proof of major-media status.; pages: 4; 5
claim: The claimed Istanbul Marketing Awards jury role lacked evidence of actual judging participation; claimed technique contribution lacked concrete examples or corroboration of field adoption.; pages: 5; 6
claim: Directing projects did not establish a leading or critical role for organizations as a whole; salary/revenue evidence lacked reliable comparative wage support.; pages: 6; 7; 8
claim: SCOPS had reserved commercial-success analysis? The AAO expressly reserved the criterion and its own formal final merits after finding the threshold unmet.; pages: 8
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Eligible for individual case discussion
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
PDF page 1 — Opening page visually inspected; date, identity, classification and posture checked.
PDF page 8 — Final physical page visually inspected; conclusion and operative order checked.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Threshold research
Coverage research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.