AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR162014_01B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision APR162014_01B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision APR162014_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; October 2, 2013 AAO decision…

Decision summary: AAO decision APR162014_01B2203: Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; October 2, 2013 AAO decision affirmed; petition remains denied. Motion to reopen lacked documentary evidence/new facts; reconsideration merely restated prior claims without identifying specific factual/legal error. Required judicial-proceedings statement was also missing.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A successive procedural motion; no independent criterion review.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

APR162014_01B2203

Decision date as printed

April 16, 2014

Classification / field stated in source

Successive combined motions to reopen and reconsider; dismissed

Procedural posture

Director denied in 2008; AAO dismissed appeal in 2009 and earlier motions through 2013. The current motions repeated claims that petitioner met six criteria, but supplied no supporting evidence and did not explain error in the latest October 2, 2013 decision.

Operative disposition

Motion to reopen dismissed; motion to reconsider dismissed; October 2, 2013 AAO decision affirmed; petition remains denied.

Final-merits status

No new final-merits review.

What the AAO decision addressed

Motion to reopen lacked documentary evidence/new facts; reconsideration merely restated prior claims without identifying specific factual/legal error. Required judicial-proceedings statement was also missing.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Decision dated April 16, 2014 identifies an EB-1A petition and successive motions after prior denial, appeal, and multiple motions.; pages: 1; 2

  • claim: Petitioner omitted the required statement concerning judicial proceedings and supplied only a brief with no supporting evidence for reopening.; pages: 2

  • claim: Motion to reconsider repeated claims of meeting six criteria but did not identify how the October 2, 2013 decision erred or cite pertinent authority.; pages: 3

  • claim: Both motions dismissed; prior decision affirmed; petition remains denied.; pages: 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Procedural only; exclude from criterion and merits aggregation.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for APR162014_01B2203