AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision Apr132009_03B2203

Thin or speculative evidence—such as a single invitation, brief citations, or letters that only predict future impact—will not satisfy EB‑1A criteria; each criterion requires concrete, documented proof of sustained national or international acclaim. Concrete evidence of receipt of awards or prizes.;

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID Apr132009_03B2203 Decision date 2009-04-13 Outcome dismissed Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • awards

  • judging

  • leading_critical_role

  • membership

  • original_contributions

  • published_material

  • scholarly_articles

Core Lesson

Thin or speculative evidence—such as a single invitation, brief citations, or letters that only predict future impact—will not satisfy EB‑1A criteria; each criterion requires concrete, documented proof of sustained national or international acclaim.

Evidence Issue

  • Concrete evidence of receipt of awards or prizes.

  • Substantial proof of a judging role (e.g., multiple invitations, evidence of completed peer‑review work).

  • Published material that is primarily about the alien, not merely citing the alien's work.

  • Demonstrable, documented impact of the alien's research showing major significance.

  • Evidence that the alien held a leading or critical role in a distinguished organization.

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.