AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR112016_02B2203: Remand

AAO EB-1A decision APR112016_02B2203: Remand

EB-1A remand — AAO decision APR112016_02B2203: remanded. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.

Decision summary: The AAO Remanded The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

APR112016_02B2203

Decision date as printed

2016-04-11

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A business; financial and information-security executive.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture not separately coded in the normalized review fields. Consult the source PDF.

Operative disposition

Remanded

Final-merits status

Not coded in the normalized review fields

What the AAO decision addressed

The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not coded — source PDF

Membership

Not coded — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not coded — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not coded — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not coded — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not coded — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not coded — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not coded — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not coded — source PDF

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: The literal final-merits-failure tag is wrong. This is a procedural remand over failure to address a motion’s arguments/new evidence (10-page brief citing policy and abstract of a Thought Leadership Talk), not a substantive finding on criteria. Do not count or describe it as an AAO denial or dismissal.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for APR112016_02B2203