AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR082019_02B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

AAO EB-1A decision APR082019_02B2203: Withdrawal and mootness

EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision APR082019_02B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for further action and new decision. Review source…

Decision summary: AAO decision APR082019_02B2203: Director decision withdrawn; remanded for further action and new decision. AAO explained being a lawyer does not categorically bar EB-1A if extraordinary ability is in business or another qualifying endeavor. It found occupation-scope evidence sufficient to show the work fell within business but did not determine any criterion or ultimate eligibility.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A occupation-scope remand; criteria and final merits unresolved.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

APR082019_02B2203

Decision date as printed

April 8, 2019

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A appeal; decision withdrawn and Remanded

Procedural posture

Director denied because occupation was not within statutory EB-1A fields. AAO found evidence showed intended work within business; it Remanded for evaluation of a major award or three criteria, then final merits if threshold met.

Operative disposition

Director decision withdrawn; Remanded for further action and new decision.

Final-merits status

Not reached; initial criteria and final merits Remanded.

What the AAO decision addressed

AAO explained being a lawyer does not categorically bar EB-1A if extraordinary ability is in business or another qualifying endeavor. It found occupation-scope evidence sufficient to show the work fell within business but did not determine any criterion or ultimate eligibility.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies Matter of J-L-, April 8, 2019; petitioner is a lawyer seeking EB-1A classification in business.; pages: 1

  • claim: Petitioner described work as managing lawyer of Chinese law firm and partner of a U.S. firm; intended work included business-client development and cross-border strategic advice.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: AAO states practicing law does not itself disqualify a person whose extraordinary-ability endeavor is business; finds occupation falls within business scope.; pages: 3

  • claim: AAO remands for director to decide one-time award or three criteria, and final merits if initial threshold is met.; pages: 3; 4

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Eligible for occupation-scope and procedural remand discussion only.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Public Service sector research

  • Threshold research

  • Final Merits research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for APR082019_02B2203