AAO research
EB-1A outcome — AAO decision APR072006_06B2203: dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision APR072006_06B2203: dismissed. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | APR072006_06B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2006-04-07 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A sciences/business; business-development manager and chemical/process engineer. |
Procedural posture | Procedural posture not separately coded in the normalized review fields. Consult the source PDF. |
Operative disposition | dismissed |
Final-merits status | Not coded in the normalized review fields |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not met — source PDF |
Membership | Not met — source PDF |
Published material about the person | Not coded — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not met — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not met — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not met — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | Not met — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | Not coded — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Potential comparison for evidentiary-chain topics: translations must be certified; a patent does not itself show major significance; salary needs comparison to similarly situated peers; old awards alone do not show sustained acclaim. Also useful as a correction case: AAO expressly withdrew the director’s unsupported insinuation about alleged Chinese cultural companies based on the petitioner’s address (p. 7). Preserve this correction if citing the case.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Entrepreneurship sector research
Computing sector research
Translat research
Major Significance research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.