AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR062020_04B2203: Motions to reopen

AAO EB-1A decision APR062020_04B2203: Motions to reopen

EB-1A motions to reopen — AAO decision APR062020_04B2203: Director’s motion decision withdrawn; matter remanded for consideration of new evidence and…

Decision summary: The AAO director’s motion decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for consideration of new evidence and issuance of a sufficiently reasoned decision. Director acknowledged new evidence supporting original contributions but did not analyze the criterion or provide an adequate explanation; AAO could not conduct meaningful appellate review. The filing’s judicial-proceeding statement was present.

Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.

Scope classification from review: EB-1A in-scope; procedural remand concerning motion reasoning, not a new criterion finding.. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.

Decision snapshot

Decision ID

APR062020_04B2203

Decision date as printed

April 6, 2020

Classification / field stated in source

EB-1A combined-motion appeal; AAO withdrew director’s motion decision and Remanded.

Procedural posture

Director denied petition for fewer than three criteria; petitioner filed combined motions to reopen/reconsider; director dismissed the motion without sufficiently explaining reasons.

Operative disposition

Director’s motion decision withdrawn; matter Remanded for consideration of new evidence and issuance of a sufficiently reasoned decision.

Final-merits status

Director previously found authorship and leading/critical role met (two criteria); original contributions was asserted in motion but not decided by AAO; no final-merits determination.

What the AAO decision addressed

Director acknowledged new evidence supporting original contributions but did not analyze the criterion or provide an adequate explanation; AAO could not conduct meaningful appellate review. The filing’s judicial-proceeding statement was present.

Criterion-by-criterion status in this source

These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.

Criterion

Source-review status

Awards

Not reached — source PDF

Membership

Not reached — source PDF

Published material about the person

Not reached — source PDF

Judging the work of others

Not reached — source PDF

Original contributions of major significance

Not reached — source PDF

Scholarly authorship

Not reached — source PDF

Artistic display or showcases

Not coded — source PDF

Leading or critical role

Not reached — source PDF

High salary or remuneration

Not reached — source PDF

Commercial success in the performing arts

Not reached — source PDF

Source-cited findings recorded in review

  • claim: Cover identifies EB-1A appeal dated April 6, 2020; petitioner is retail business consultant.; pages: 1

  • claim: Director had found two criteria (authorship and leading/critical role) met; combined motion added evidence for original contributions.; pages: 2

  • claim: Director did not analyze new contribution evidence or adequately explain denial; AAO Remanded for review and a reasoned new decision.; pages: 2; 3

  • claim: AAO did not determine original contributions or final merits.; pages: 2; 3

How this record may be used in research

Comparison scope: Procedural remand only; no criterion outcome aggregation.

Page-level source trail

Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.

How to use this record

This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.

Related corpus research

  • Full-corpus research index

  • Published material about the person research

  • Leading or critical role research

  • Entrepreneurship sector research

  • Remand research

Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.

Primary source

Official USCIS AAO decision PDF for APR062020_04B2203