AAO research
EB-1A appeal disposition — AAO decision APR052005_16B2203: sustained. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision APR052005_16B2203: sustained. The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | APR052005_16B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | 2005-04-05 |
Classification / field stated in source | Classification not stated in the normalized review fields |
Procedural posture | Appeal sustained; petition approved (pp. 2, 4). |
Operative disposition | sustained |
Final-merits status | No separately labeled modern Kazarian final-merits section. AAO states in aggregate that sustained national acclaim and continued work at the highest level were established, then approved (pp. 2, 4). |
What the AAO decision addressed
The review record does not provide a normalized explanation of the disposition. Consult the cited source pages.
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | Not coded — source PDF |
Membership | Not coded — source PDF |
Published material about the person | met — source PDF |
Judging the work of others | Not coded — source PDF |
Original contributions of major significance | Not coded — source PDF |
Scholarly authorship | Not coded — source PDF |
Artistic display or showcases | Not coded — source PDF |
Leading or critical role | Not coded — source PDF |
High salary or remuneration | met — source PDF |
Commercial success in the performing arts | met — source PDF |
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Potential positive performing-arts comparison for documented media, unusually high compensation relative to a field comparator, and measurable commercial film success. Require a historical-case label; don't transplant old reasoning without current authority.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.