AAO research
EB-1A withdrawal and mootness — AAO decision APR052005_07B2203: The appeal is dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. Review source status, procedural…
Decision summary: AAO decision APR052005_07B2203: The appeal is dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. p. 1, DISCUSSION and ORDER.
Source limitation: The review record contains a source hold or limitation. Read the limitation below before relying on any case detail; unresolved facts are not treated as findings.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | APR052005_07B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | April 5, 2005 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary-ability Form I-140 appeal/AAO action as printed in source; a non-precedent label is recorded only for documents whose page visibly says “Non-Precedent Decision.” |
Procedural posture | Nebraska Service Center denied the EB-1A petition on April 23, 2003; counsel requested withdrawal of the appeal on July 28, 2003. |
Operative disposition | The appeal is dismissed based on withdrawal by counsel. |
Final-merits status | not considered |
What the AAO decision addressed
p. 1, DISCUSSION and ORDER
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source holds and limits
["The text identifies a denial and appeal, but does not examine the denial’s evidence or eligibility findings.", "This case is one non-precedent administrative record and does not establish a general prediction about other petitions."]
Specific caveats recorded by the reviewer
The text identifies a denial and appeal, but does not examine the denial’s evidence or eligibility findings.
This case is one non-precedent administrative record and does not establish a general prediction about other petitions.
Source-cited findings recorded in review
p. 1, DISCUSSION and ORDER
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: withdrawal-based dismissal Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision; consider only as a cited example in a broader page after more source-grounded cases are reviewed.
Editorial use note: Do not create an individual indexable page from this short procedural decision; consider only as a cited example in a broader page after more source-grounded cases are reviewed.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
Open the official USCIS decision PDF. Page-specific citations were not available in the normalized row.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Withdrawal research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.