AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR042018_02B2203

Strong citation metrics and extensive peer‑review service can satisfy the judging and scholarly‑article criteria and demonstrate that you are among the top 1% of your field, even without a major award. explicit, independent evidence of sustained national or international acclaim beyond citation metr

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR042018_02B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome sustained Field or occupation Not stated in the extracted decision plan. Final merits discussed Yes

Criteria Discussed

  • judging

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Accepted

  • judging

  • original_contributions

  • scholarly_articles

Criteria Rejected

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Core Lesson

Strong citation metrics and extensive peer‑review service can satisfy the judging and scholarly‑article criteria and demonstrate that you are among the top 1% of your field, even without a major award.

Evidence Issue

  • explicit, independent evidence of sustained national or international acclaim beyond citation metrics

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.