AAO research

AAO EB-1A decision APR022026_01B2203: dance and published-material evidence pitfalls for eb-1a

Simply listing awards, memberships, or media mentions is insufficient; each piece of evidence must be directly tied to sustained national/international acclaim and clearly demonstrate that the petitioner belongs to the small percentage of top performers in the field. no evidence of sustained nationa

Decision Snapshot

Field Value --- --- Decision ID APR022026_01B2203 Decision date not stated Outcome dismissed Field or occupation dance Final merits discussed No / not stated

Criteria Discussed

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • judging

  • membership

  • published_material

Criteria Accepted

Not stated in the extracted decision plan.

Criteria Rejected

  • artistic_display

  • awards

  • judging

  • membership

  • published_material

Core Lesson

Simply listing awards, memberships, or media mentions is insufficient; each piece of evidence must be directly tied to sustained national/international acclaim and clearly demonstrate that the petitioner belongs to the small percentage of top performers in the field.

Evidence Issue

  • no evidence of sustained national or international acclaim

  • no linkage showing petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of the field

  • awards not demonstrated to be of upper‑echelon significance

  • membership not tied to recognized acclaim

  • media coverage deemed insufficient to reflect top‑tier success

How This Connects

This decision is part of Extraordinary's AAO EB-1A corpus. It is exposed as a structured decision card so readers, search engines, and AI search systems can connect the decision to broader EB-1A evidence patterns.

Source Note

Non-precedent AAO decisions are used as evidence examples. They are not binding authority and do not predict any individual case.