AAO research
EB-1A appeal arguments — AAO decision APR012013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. Review source status, procedural posture and the official USCIS PDF.
Decision summary: AAO decision APR012013_01B2203: Appeal dismissed. No criterion merits review. The appeal did not identify which criteria were met or specific error; appeal is dismissed under the summary-dismissal regulation (pp. 2–3).
Source reviewed: This page summarizes the specific AAO source and posture recorded in the completed source-review tracker. It does not turn a nonprecedent decision into a general rule.
Scope classification from review: In scope; verified in source review. This is a source-review label, not a legal conclusion.
Decision snapshot
Decision ID | APR012013_01B2203 |
|---|---|
Decision date as printed | April 1, 2013 |
Classification / field stated in source | EB-1A extraordinary ability in the arts; petitioner says she is an actor. |
Procedural posture | Director denied Nov. 19, 2012. Petitioner/counsel asserted generally that petitioner was an actor of extraordinary ability, would continue in the field, and had met at least three criteria; a supplemental brief was promised but not filed for over three months. AAO found no specific alleged error and summarily dismissed. |
Operative disposition | Appeal dismissed. |
Final-merits status | not reached |
What the AAO decision addressed
No criterion merits review. The appeal did not identify which criteria were met or specific error; appeal is dismissed under the summary-dismissal regulation (pp. 2–3).
Criterion-by-criterion status in this source
These labels reproduce the source-review record. “Not considered,” “not reached,” and “not coded” do not mean the criterion failed. A Director finding recited as background is not an AAO holding unless the decision says so.
Criterion | Source-review status |
|---|---|
Awards | not considered |
Membership | not considered |
Published material about the person | not considered |
Judging the work of others | not considered |
Original contributions of major significance | not considered |
Scholarly authorship | not considered |
Artistic display or showcases | not considered |
Leading or critical role | not considered |
High salary or remuneration | not considered |
Commercial success in the performing arts | not considered |
Source-cited findings recorded in review
No criterion merits review. The appeal did not identify which criteria were met or specific error; appeal is dismissed under the summary-dismissal regulation (pp. 2–3).
How this record may be used in research
Comparison scope: Do not attribute petitioner’s three-criteria claim as an AAO finding.
Editorial use note: May support carefully scoped, source-cited procedural or evidentiary guidance; clearly label as nonprecedent and preserve procedural posture.
Page-level source trail
Use the official PDF and the cited physical page numbers to check each statement.
How to use this record
This is a historical, nonprecedent AAO decision about its own administrative record. It is not a prediction, success rate, or current filing instruction. Compare the issue and procedural stage before drawing an analogy. The current framework is in the USCIS Policy Manual, Volume 6, Part F, Chapter 2.
Related corpus research
Full-corpus research index
Awards research
Membership research
Published material about the person research
Judging the work of others research
Original contributions of major significance research
Scholarly authorship research
Artistic display or showcases research
Leading or critical role research
High salary or remuneration research
Commercial success in the performing arts research
Performance sector research
Browse the AAO decision index · Read EB-1A evidence guides · Review source and correction methodology.